[ocaml-infra] Fwd: [Caml-list] Working Group: the future of syntax extensions in OCaml, after camlp4

[Ashish Agarwal]

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil at recoil.org> wrote:


>  > what's the best way to reflect this on ocaml.org?
> >
> > Do you mean to publicize the groups? We've had some discussion [1] about
> a User Groups page, which could be generalized to groups of all sorts,
> perhaps split into different sections. Working groups could all be listed
> here with a description and links to their mailing lists, etc. Actually,
> this resolves the problem we were having that currently there are not
> enough groups to justify a whole separate page.
>
> It's not quite a user group though... it's more to get some reasonable
> consensus and well-thought out patches to propose upstream without lots of
> different opinions preventing anything from being merged.
>

So do you mean you'd rather not list the working groups on ocaml.org? Or
not in the place I suggested?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ocaml.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20130125/0ede4d3c/attachment.html>