[ocaml-infra] Staging Build and Deployment of ocaml.org

Anil Madhavapeddy anil at recoil.org
Mon Mar 17 12:32:54 GMT 2014


On 17 Mar 2014, at 12:26, Christophe Troestler <Christophe.Troestler at umons.ac.be> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:12:00 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>> 
>> On 17 Mar 2014, at 12:09, David Sheets <sheets at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>> In my opinion, all such references are bugs and beta.ocaml.org would
>>> be operating correctly if these references are misdirected there. One
>>> of the nice things about having an image of the static assets deployed
>>> is that, if we stick to polyglot (X)HTML in our generated pages, we
>>> can trivially check, at any time, for broken links and violations of
>>> link policies like this one.
>> 
>> Agreed.
> 
> A quick recursive grep shows there a no such references except in
> site/docs/logos.md where they make sense.  (There are of course links
> to opam.ocaml.org which is not under consideration for the moment but
> maybe it will be integrated one day?)

Ah yes, that was indeed the problem last time.  There's no real reason
why opam needs a sub-domain, but moving it to a subdomain of ocaml.org
would require sorting out the templates to match that of the ocaml.org
design.

-anil


More information about the Infrastructure mailing list