[opam-devel] [Caml-list] [ANN] IOCaml v0.3
anders at fugmann.net
Mon Feb 17 12:33:29 GMT 2014
If possible, I think the zmq package should conflict with ocaml-zmq. I
dont think they can co-exist, as they are both called 'ZMQ' wrt. ocamlfind.
On 02/17/2014 12:27 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> Thanks! I've now merged in your zmq library, and have a candidate iocaml
> port at: https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/pull/1690
> I'll wait for Andy to acknowledge the port before merging it, as I've added
> a small patch to improve OPAM compatibility.
> On 17 Feb 2014, at 08:25, Anders Fugmann <anders at fugmann.net> wrote:
>> Hi Anil,
>> I created a tag '3.2-0'.
>> 3.2 indicates the zmq c library version, and 0 is the version of the ocaml bindings. The opam package could then have version 3.2.0
>> This is not Semantic Versioning. If you have a better suggestion for tag names, please let me know.
>> As for the ubuntu/debian zmq package names, the needed packages are called 'libzmq3' for runtime and 'libzmq3-dev' is needed for compilation.
>> Anders Fugmann
>>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning
>> On 02/14/2014 04:51 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>>> On 14 Feb 2014, at 14:31, Anders Fugmann <anders at fugmann.net> wrote:
>>>> On 02/14/2014 02:32 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>>>>> The reason I suggest adding a new package `zmq` in this case is
>>>>> because the existing `ocaml-zmq` is misnamed in OPAM anyway, so we
>>>>> can solve two problems at once.
>>>> I'm all fine with this name change.
>>>> If you like to have a tag in the git repository to track opam versions, please let me know.
>>> A release tag would be great. Is there an Ubuntu zeromq package
>>> with the right version? Need to add that to the depexts field to
>>> pass the test bot for OPAM stable.
More information about the opam-devel