<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">On 14 Feb 2014, at 17:30, Jeremie Dimino <<a href="mailto:jdimino@janestreet.com">jdimino@janestreet.com</a>> wrote:<br><div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:anil@recoil.org" target="_blank">anil@recoil.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex; position: static; z-index: auto;"><div class="">for a build failure of OPAM-trunk on OCaml-trunk in avsm:ppa-experimental. I'm CC Jeremie in case he's motivated to provide a replacement deb package for camlp4, but I'd much prefer if we could not depend on it and build camlp4 out of OPAM instead. The reason for this is that if the camlp4 host tool is installed, it will be hard to spot missing dependencies as it will be picked up even when base-camlp4 is missing.<br>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div style="">TBH I don't think I can do that in the near future. I'm quite busy at the moment and I haven't done debian packages for quite a while... </div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>Thanks for confirming -- I don't think there's an urgent need for a camlp4 package anyway. Let's wait and see how difficult a camlp4-less OPAM would be to achieve instead.</div><div><br></div><div>-anil</div><br></body></html>