[ocaml-platform] [Caml-list] Package compilation and debug mode

Ivan Gotovchits ivg at ieee.org
Sun Mar 13 19:16:22 GMT 2016


It looks like, that currently the `-g` option has no performance cost at all (correct me if I’m wrong). Presumably, there is some increase in the package size, but who cares. With these premises, I think it would be a good policy to distribute packages with `-g` flag enabled.  

> On Mar 12, 2016, at 4:35 PM, Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buenzli at erratique.ch> wrote:
> 
> Hello,  
> 
> I'd like to know what the consensus is about distributing packages that always compile in debug mode. It seems that some persons do want to have debug always enabled [1,2], but the discussion is not clear cut [1]. 
> 
> By default all my packages are released with -g disabled. It seems easy enough to have an opam switch (even the official one) that automatically enables the flag.
> 
> So I think OCaml's opam repository should have a policy here. The answer should also take system package managers into account since those pull directly from the tarballs (if this document [3] is still in use for debian it seems they do require compilation with debug mode).
> 
> Personally I don't have an opinion about it, I'm rather seeking an answer here.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Daniel
> 
> [1] http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=6728
> [2] http://rgrinberg.com/blog/2016/02/26/opam-package-checklist/
> [3] http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.html/c305.html#AEN307
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs



More information about the Platform mailing list