[containers-users] Request for comments on BiMap

[Simon Cruanes]

Le Sat, 24 Feb 2018, Drup wrote:
> Why not call this "Bijection" or "BijMap" ? BiMap simply implies two maps.
> This a bit more specific.

It makes sense! `Bijection` is about the intent, `BiMap` ties to an
implementation. However if we change the name we still have to convey
that it's a functional bijection (rather than imperative).


-- 
Simon Cruanes

http://weusepgp.info/
key 49AA62B6, fingerprint 949F EB87 8F06 59C6 D7D3  7D8D 4AC0 1D08 49AA 62B6
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ocaml.org/pipermail/containers-users/attachments/20180224/b58b4c80/attachment.sig>