[ocaml-infra] Redesigning OCaml.org
Christophe TROESTLER
Christophe.Troestler at umons.ac.be
Tue Aug 6 10:46:01 BST 2013
Hi,
Thanks for the work Philippe !
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:53:22 +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>
> Feedback on the design would be most useful, as we can do a few
> iterations with the company that did the HTML/CSS/logo work and
> make sure we're all happy with the final result. Personally, I
> love the new front page.
Maybe one can discuss first the front page. Here are a few questions.
- Where should all the links of the current page go? On sub-pages or
may some of them (which ones) appear below "Learn",...? If we move
them to separate pages, what text must be put on the side of the four
boxes?
- Do we want the top menu stay as it is or offer drop-downs? The
latter reduces the number of clicks but one may prefer to always land
on the dedicated pages.
- Is the current distinction between more permanent news (managed by
hand) and RSS feeds enough? Also, one would certainly like to add
"Preliminary program is available" under "OCaml 2013".
- Do we want a "Read more" button under "OCaml is an industrial..."?
Or rather a "What is OCaml?" under "Learn"?
- In the "Packages" table, do we really want an "author" column? The
"Package" column is already not wide enough. One could also think
about putting in a tooltip the single line describing the package.
Finally, I do not think OPAM has a "Category" field ATM.
My 0.02€,
C.
More information about the Infrastructure
mailing list