[ocaml-infra] blog.ocaml.org

[Maxence Guesdon]

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 13:41:22 -0500
Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Going this route, we could probably do something ourselves and avoid the
> extra dependency. We're also thinking about supporting wiki syntax for a
> subset of the content, so we'll consider all these points collectively.
> I'll start a wiki page to layout the implementation choices.

For information, stog was originally designed to be a static blog
generator, with ability to display evaluated ocaml code. See these two
posts:

  http://zoggy.github.com/stog/posts/displaying-evaluated-ocaml-code.html
  http://zoggy.github.com/stog/posts/ocaml-sessions.html

and an example of big document with lots of evaluated ocaml code, that
is the code is verified at generation time:

  http://form-ocaml.forge.ocamlcore.org/intro_ocaml.html

Cheers,

Maxence

> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil at recoil.org> wrote:
> 
> > It would be easier from a deployment perspective to have something that
> > outputs static HTML.  Would a Jekyll [1] configuration be better?
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/mojombo/jekyll
> >
> > -a
> >
> > On 7 Jan 2013, at 23:11, Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think it would help to have a blog for ocaml.org. Any chance we can add
> > this to the ocaml.org infrastructure? We could wordpress.com. I think
> > they allow using a custom URL, so we could host there but still serve the
> > blog from blog.ocaml.org.
> >
> > I just checked and ocaml.wordpress.com is already taken. Does anybody
> > know by who?
> >
> > -Ashish
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> > Infrastructure mailing list
> > Infrastructure at lists.ocaml.org
> > http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/infrastructure
> >
> >
> >