anil at recoil.org
Mon Mar 18 16:04:05 GMT 2013
On 18 Mar 2013, at 10:58, Thomas Gazagnaire <thomas at ocamlpro.com> wrote:
>> The FreeBSD bug that snuck into 1.0.0 breaks quite a few things on that platform. The OS is considered to be "freebs", which is an unfortunate typo :-)
> Can't we just use "freebs" as an OS filter for now ? Or can we tell people on freeBSD to install from sources for `master` (if we fix the typo in master) ?
The former won't be very nice when we fix the bug! We could just tell people to run trunk, yeah...
>> Thomas, should we issue a 1.0.1 point release with the fix, to make it easier to debug the other FreeBSD issues?
> Not sure it's worth running the release cycle again ...
If there's nothing else in the queue immediately, it would be better not to let fixes linger in trunk... (but you might have other patches queued, hence this question)
More information about the opam-devel