[opam-devel] versioning of Core packages
anil at recoil.org
Mon Mar 25 16:35:29 GMT 2013
On 25 Mar 2013, at 16:33, Jeremie Dimino <jdimino at janestreet.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil at recoil.org> wrote:
>> Yeah they would. I was thinking of a heuristic that would require only the root packages to be upgraded to their latest versions (that is, the ones explicitly installed by the OPAM user), and leave intermediate packages until a full upgrade is requested.
>> However, it would just be easier if the versioning was decoupled from the get-go.
> Agreed. It seems much simpler this way. I can do that for the next
> week release.
Thanks! The staging builds for this 109.15.00 are still running, but look fine so far.
More information about the opam-devel