[opam-devel] packages tree
Anil Madhavapeddy
anil at recoil.org
Sat Mar 30 18:56:36 GMT 2013
There is some support for this in OPAM-1.0, but we haven't migrated the repositories yet. See:
https://github.com/OCamlPro/opam/issues/483
for the full discussion and resulting patch.
-anil
On 30 Mar 2013, at 15:53, Florent Monnier <monnier.florent at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my opinion if the tree instead of:
>
> batteries.1.4.3
> batteries.1.5.0
> batteries.2.0.0
>
> was:
>
> batteries/1.4.3
> batteries/1.5.0
> batteries/2.0.0
>
> it would make both human and script browsing easier.
>
> --
> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> opam-devel mailing list
> opam-devel at lists.ocaml.org
> http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
>
More information about the opam-devel
mailing list