[opam-devel] packages tree

[Anil Madhavapeddy]

There is some support for this in OPAM-1.0, but we haven't migrated the repositories yet. See:

https://github.com/OCamlPro/opam/issues/483

for the full discussion and resulting patch.

-anil

On 30 Mar 2013, at 15:53, Florent Monnier <monnier.florent at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In my opinion if the tree instead of:
> 
> batteries.1.4.3
> batteries.1.5.0
> batteries.2.0.0
> 
> was:
> 
> batteries/1.4.3
> batteries/1.5.0
> batteries/2.0.0
> 
> it would make both human and script browsing easier.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> opam-devel mailing list
> opam-devel at lists.ocaml.org
> http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
>