[opam-devel] [Caml-list] [ANN] IOCaml v0.3

[Anders Fugmann]

Looks good.

If possible, I think the zmq package should conflict with ocaml-zmq. I 
dont think they can co-exist, as they are both called 'ZMQ' wrt. ocamlfind.

Thanks,
Anders



On 02/17/2014 12:27 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> Thanks!  I've now merged in your zmq library, and have a candidate iocaml
> port at: https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/pull/1690
>
> I'll wait for Andy to acknowledge the port before merging it, as I've added
> a small patch to improve OPAM compatibility.
>
> -anil
>
> On 17 Feb 2014, at 08:25, Anders Fugmann <anders at fugmann.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Anil,
>>
>> I created a tag '3.2-0'.
>> 3.2 indicates the zmq c library version, and 0 is the version of the ocaml bindings. The opam package could then have version 3.2.0
>>
>> This is not Semantic Versioning[1]. If you have a better suggestion for tag names, please let me know.
>>
>> As for the ubuntu/debian zmq package names, the needed packages are called 'libzmq3' for runtime and 'libzmq3-dev' is needed for compilation.
>>
>> Regards
>> Anders Fugmann
>>
>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning
>>
>>
>> On 02/14/2014 04:51 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>>> On 14 Feb 2014, at 14:31, Anders Fugmann <anders at fugmann.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02/14/2014 02:32 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>>>>> The reason I suggest adding a new package `zmq` in this case is
>>>>> because the existing `ocaml-zmq` is misnamed in OPAM anyway, so we
>>>>> can solve two problems at once.
>>>> I'm all fine with this name change.
>>>>
>>>> If you like to have a tag in the git repository to track opam versions, please let me know.
>>>
>>> A release tag would be great.  Is there an Ubuntu zeromq package
>>> with the right version?  Need to add that to the depexts field to
>>> pass the test bot for OPAM stable.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Anil
>>>
>>>
>>
>