[ocaml-platform] on the need and design of OCaml namespaces

[Christophe TROESTLER]

On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:39:41 +0100, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
>
> So if the problem is `-pack` is not good enough because it produces 
> a huge `cmo`, why not just try to find a corresponding concept 
> workable with `cm[x]a` ?

As I understand it, people are not happy with -pack not for the large 
cm[x]a files but because the whole library is included in every 
executable even if only a small subset of the library is used.  Would 
the "problem" with -pack still exist if this was solved?