[ocaml-platform] Is this mandatory to continue this discussion [was: on the need and design of OCaml namespaces]

[Alain Frisch]

On 02/26/2013 01:11 AM, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> My 2nd take on this:
> Put this to vote !
> With the following proposals:
> A. Implement rich namespace
> B. Implement simple flat namespace
> C. Fix -pack issue rather than implementing namespace
> D. Postpone discussion

E. Advertize a naming convention for modules to avoid clashes, and 
provide very light support in the language/compiler/tools to reduce the 
syntactic overhead of using long names for users of "standard libraries".


Alain