[ocaml-platform] [opam-devel] OPAM 1.1.1 RC

[Christophe Troestler]

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:27:54 +0100, Louis Gesbert wrote:
> 
> Indeed, that would break (quite badly) -- Thomas thought that the url file already supported (unused) archive lists, but that must have been removed at some point.
> If it's very important to have this now, I can modify the patch so that it only changes the repo in a 1.1.0-compatible way, by adding a `mirror` field instead of changing the current type of the `archive` and similar fields. I tend to think that the smoothness of upgrade may be worth the slightly less clear resulting file format.
> 
> Any opinions on this ? The problem still exists even if we shift that after release.

Does it break if we allow several archive fields?