[wg-camlp4] Request for feedback
alain.frisch at lexifi.com
Thu Mar 7 15:32:24 GMT 2013
On 03/07/2013 03:43 PM, Gabriel Scherer wrote:
> I think it would be useful to see concrete example use cases, to get a
> better feel of the concrete syntax choices.
> Could you go over some of the examples in
> , and transcode the ones that are reachable through such annotations
> in your current syntax?
Good suggestion. I've committed a list of examples at the end of:
As a small change, the "id" of attributes and extension nodes can now be
uppercase identifiers (and later, keywords will also be accepted).
Should we accept qualified identifiers as well?
More information about the wg-camlp4