[ocaml-infra] documenting the ocaml.org implementation

[Ashish Agarwal]

Does "infrastructure" include discussions about content, design, whether
the frontpage should have another box on the right below the other two or
in the middle, ...? Just making sure you want all that kind of discussion
on this list. If so, it's okay with me to merge them. Christophe?


On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil at recoil.org> wrote:

> Very useful; I'll move infrastructure information on here as well (it's
> currently in ad-hoc Markdown files on the OCaml Labs www).
>
> I reckon putting all this discussion on this list is most useful...if you
> want, I can inject old mbox archives into this list to merge them.
>
> -anil
>
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:45:55PM -0500, Ashish Agarwal wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I started a couple pages on the ocaml.org repo's wiki [1]. The Assets
> page
> > will help us know what are all the different pieces that fall under the
> > ownership of ocaml.org, who manages them, and what they are for.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml.org/wiki
> >
> > Also, I'm not sure whether to use the
> > ocamlweb-devel at lists.forge.ocamlcore.org list or this one from now on. I
> > don't mind deleting the former as it isn't widely used. But should all
> > discussion about ocaml.org go on this infrastructure list?
> >
> > -Ashish
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Infrastructure mailing list
> > Infrastructure at lists.ocaml.org
> > http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/infrastructure
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ocaml.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20130109/ebffc037/attachment.html>