[ocaml-infra] Tuareg → OCaml umbrella
agarwal1975 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 7 13:56:28 GMT 2014
We're overthinking the meaning of github.com/ocaml. Having a repo there
doesn't make it better or more official than code elsewhere. It's just a
place to put things that are of general use to the OCaml community and have
no other logical place to go. I see no reason we couldn't have two emacs
modes hosted there.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil at recoil.org> wrote:
> On 5 Jan 2014, at 10:15, Christophe Troestler <
> Christophe.Troestler at umons.ac.be> wrote:
> > Hi Gabriel,
> > On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 00:06:47 +0100, Gabriel Scherer wrote:
> >> I hope this does not sound too negative, but I'm not sure we would
> >> gain by "blessing" tuareg as "the" ocaml editor mode for Emacs.
> > No offense taken. My point in asking Tuareg to be under the OCaml
> > umbrella is that it is not really a project of mine so I felt a bit
> > strange to have it under my name (but it can stay that way, I do not
> > mind so much either).
> I actually think of github.com/ocaml not as an "official" blessing
> (whatever that means), but as a place where repositories used by
> the ocaml.org infrastructure can have a home.
> In this case, I'd like to see all the editor tools centralized on
> the GitHub so that we can clone them to regularly publish a Vagrant
> VM with all the build tools installed by default. If Tuareg is the
> correct Emacs editor mode of choice *at the moment*, then it's
> appropriate to host there. This should be a separate discussion
> from future fixes to Emacs-mode (which is, of course, important as
> well, but shouldn't block the Vagrant release).
> Anyway, Vim mode is easy ("use Merlin!"), so you'll all have to
> educate me on the Emacs story over at:
> Infrastructure mailing list
> Infrastructure at lists.ocaml.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Infrastructure