monnier.florent at gmail.com
Wed Jan 8 23:40:04 GMT 2014
2014/1/8, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 8 Jan 2014, at 21:47, Florent Monnier wrote:
>> 2014/01/07, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>>> I'd prefer to minimize the number of domains, so I'm happy enough with
>>> ocaml.org unless someone has a reason why we need more.
>> If there are no other volunteers,
>> and if noone has objections against it,
>> I would enjoy to take .eu and .fr,
>> and eventually I would try to do something that is
>> a little bit less accademic (and maybe also less
>> men-oriented, based on inspirations from .)
>> But if it's intentional, and if you have good reasons to
>> make the ocaml community very academic and masculine,
>> then please ignore this naive and utopic proposition.
> I honestly have no idea what you're talking about here. Is
> there something specifically gender- or career-specific that
> you can point out that should be improved?
> If you do have some concrete suggestions to improve the
> ocaml.org content, then please do file them on the bug tracker
> at https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml.org/issues.
No sorry, I can not explain more about  and I can not fill issues
about  and accademic things that I don't understand. Because I
myself don't understand enough about it.
Maybe we could ask to the Debian OCaml Task Force  about what  means?
I would indeed probably need some enlightenments about the topic.
More information about the Infrastructure