[wg-camlp4] Changes to the parsetree
Alain Frisch
alain.frisch at lexifi.com
Mon Mar 25 18:49:49 GMT 2013
On 03/25/2013 03:13 PM, jathdr wrote:
> Could we get a summary of the current syntax proposal? I've been
> following along, but I'm a bit lost as to what has been discussed,
> accepted, rejected, etc.
This file describes the current syntax proposal:
http://caml.inria.fr/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/ocaml/branches/extension_points/experimental/frisch/extension_points.txt?revision=HEAD&view=markup
> This is probably a bit off topic, but while we're talking about
> interval patterns: I discovered the other day that interval patterns
> only work for chars, while I always assumed they also worked for
> ints. Is there a reason why they don't?
Currently, range patterns for characters are expanded in the parser.
Doing so for integers as well could lead to huge or-patterns to be
processed by the rest of the compiler. Supporting range patterns
directly in the compiler would add a little bit of extra complexity for
type-checking (exhaustiveness check) and code generation. I don't see
any theoretical problem, though.
-- Alain
More information about the wg-camlp4
mailing list