[wg-camlp4] Changes to the parsetree

[Alain Frisch]

On 03/26/2013 01:49 PM, Thomas Gazagnaire wrote:
> For the @@sexp and @@xml parts, you won't see that in real-codebases. Usually, all the types in a given module/file have their associated generators.

This is rather minor (especially considering that other use cases are 
sufficient to justify "item" attributes on individual types), but isn't 
it possible to provide a custom function for a specific type instead of 
asking the extension to generate the function?


-- Alain