[wg-camlp4] Changes to the parsetree

Leo White lpw25 at cam.ac.uk
Tue Mar 26 19:58:31 GMT 2013

> This is rather minor (especially considering that other use cases are sufficient to justify "item" attributes on
> individual types), but isn't it possible to provide a custom function for a specific type instead of asking the
> extension to generate the function?

You can, but it is difficult to do it for mutually recursive types since the
functions will probably also have to be mutually recursive.

More information about the wg-camlp4 mailing list