agarwal1975 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 8 22:21:21 GMT 2014
I also don't know what you're referring to, but please provide any feedback
on how ocaml.org can be more inclusive.
I'd be opposed to using ocaml.eu and ocaml.fr specifically for
women-friendly OCaml websites. That would be odd, implying the OCaml
communities in the EU and France are more friendly to women than elsewhere.
If special content for women is justified, why wouldn't it go directly on
ocaml.org. We could make ocaml.org/women, just like the Debian page you
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil at recoil.org> wrote:
> On 8 Jan 2014, at 21:47, Florent Monnier <monnier.florent at gmail.com>
> > 2014/01/07, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> >> I'd prefer to minimize the number of domains, so I'm happy enough with
> >> ocaml.org unless someone has a reason why we need more.
> > If there are no other volunteers,
> > and if noone has objections against it,
> > I would enjoy to take .eu and .fr,
> > and eventually I would try to do something that is
> > a little bit less accademic (and maybe also less
> > men-oriented, based on inspirations from .)
> > But if it's intentional, and if you have good reasons to
> > make the ocaml community very academic and masculine,
> > then please ignore this naive and utopic proposition.
> I honestly have no idea what you're talking about here. Is
> there something specifically gender- or career-specific that
> you can point out that should be improved?
> If you do have some concrete suggestions to improve the
> ocaml.org content, then please do file them on the bug tracker
> at https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml.org/issues.
> Infrastructure mailing list
> Infrastructure at lists.ocaml.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Infrastructure