[ocaml-infra] ocaml.org licensing
agarwal1975 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 2 15:46:41 GMT 2014
According to our records , only a few pages were taken from cocan.org.
As I stated, I was told that this content was in the public domain, but the
link you provide seems potentially to contradict that for cocan.org. To be
on the safe side, we can go ahead and ask permission from all contributors
to cocan.org and ocaml-tutorial.org, pointing out to them that content was
pulled from those sites.
The most comprehensive list we have of these contributors is here .
Daniel, your name is not listed here, so it is already evident this list
doesn't include contributions to cocan.org. It's the best I can think of.
If anyone knows additional contributors that should be contacted, please
let us know.
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Bünzli
<daniel.buenzli at erratique.ch>wrote:
> Le dimanche, 2 mars 2014 à 00:51, Ashish Agarwal a écrit :
> > The next issue is whether we need to ask past contributors to agree to
> the new licenses. There are three categories of past contributors:
> There's one more, the content taken from cocan.org. When I mentioned 
> this Ashish quickly side stepped the issue . But if you want to be
> copyright clean, I think you should also sort out this one. This page 
> says the copyright is owned by the various contributors (it says "listed
> below", but for sure there was not only Richard Jones contributing to the
> wiki, he can't claim copyright to the content of the wiki).
> Regarding my content taken for there, it can of course be reused without
> problem (and no need to mention me in the contributors).
> Infrastructure mailing list
> Infrastructure at lists.ocaml.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Infrastructure